California Defective Product Attorneys

At DearLegal, we connect you with experienced California defective product attorneys who understand the state’s industry-leading strict liability framework, the Barker v. Lull two-prong design defect test, and the unique consumer product, tech, and pharmaceutical cases that come out of Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, and the Silicon Valley supply chain. Whether you were hurt by a defective vehicle, lithium-ion battery, drug, or medical device, we’ll match you with the right attorney at no cost to get started.

California recognizes three theories: manufacturing defects (the product departed from intended design — Cronin), design defects (analyzed under Barker’s dual test — either the product failed to meet ordinary consumer expectations OR the risks of the design outweigh its benefits), and failure-to-warn defects (the manufacturer failed to warn of a known or knowable risk). Plaintiffs typically plead all three.

Manufacturing defects are unit-level — one bad airbag inflator. Design defects affect the entire product line — a rollover-prone SUV. Failure-to-warn defects mean the product is safe with proper warnings but the manufacturer didn’t provide them — common in Rx drugs (learned-intermediary doctrine) and industrial chemicals.

Yes. California courts impose spoliation sanctions on either party that destroys product evidence. Photograph the product, store it securely, and have your attorney send preservation letters to the manufacturer, distributor, and retailer. For burned products, retain fire-origin investigators immediately.

Strict liability under Vandermark v. Ford Motor (1964) extends to manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and even lessors and successor corporations in some cases. California does not have a broad innocent-seller statute, so retailers remain on the hook. Component manufacturers can be sued under O’Neil v. Crane Co. principles.

NHTSA, CPSC, and FDA recall notices are admissible evidence of defect under California law. California courts often rely on recall data to allow class certification and coordinated proceedings (JCCPs) in state court.

Quick offers often undervalue future damages. Once you sign a California release, it’s very difficult to reopen (CCP § 1542 must be specifically waived). Have an attorney evaluate the claim, including life-care plans and lost earning capacity, before signing.

California defective product attorneys typically work on contingency — 33% to 40% of recovery, sometimes higher for trial or appeal. Cal. Rule of Prof. Conduct 1.5 governs reasonableness. Case costs are advanced by the firm.

Why Do You Need a Defective Product Attorney in California?

California pioneered modern strict products liability in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products (1963) and Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson (1972), then developed the dual consumer-expectation and risk-utility test in Barker v. Lull Engineering (1978). California is a pure comparative fault state under Li v. Yellow Cab (1975), meaning plaintiffs can recover even at 99% fault. California has no general products statute of repose — making it one of the most plaintiff-friendly products jurisdictions in the country for latent-defect claims. The 2-year statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 runs from injury or discovery for hidden defects. Combined with the state’s sophisticated consumer-protection laws (Song-Beverly, CLRA, UCL) and active MDL/coordination dockets, California offers powerful tools for product victims.

When Do You Need a Defective Product Attorney in California?

Our network includes California defective product attorneys who handle every kind of case, including:

Types of Defective Product Cases in California

From the moment you connect with a California defective product attorney, they go to work protecting your claim. The most common case types we handle:

Discarding or returning the defective product before preservation — fatal to the case

Missing the 2-year SOL under CCP § 335.1, even when the discovery rule could have extended it

Failing to send preservation letters to manufacturer, distributor, and retailer

Accepting a manufacturer settlement without a CCP § 1542 evaluation and damages workup

Posting product photos or commentary on social media — defense uses these for misuse arguments

Missing JCCP coordination deadlines or MDL opt-out windows for the product

Discarding or returning the defective product before preservation — fatal to the case

Missing the 2-year SOL under CCP § 335.1, even when the discovery rule could have extended it

Failing to send preservation letters to manufacturer, distributor, and retailer

Accepting a manufacturer settlement without a CCP § 1542 evaluation and damages workup

Posting product photos or commentary on social media — defense uses these for misuse arguments

Missing JCCP coordination deadlines or MDL opt-out windows for the product

Common California Defective Product Mistakes

Even a small misstep can hurt your case. Here’s what to avoid:

How Much Do California Defective Product Attorneys Cost?

33%

Typical starting contingency fee — you pay nothing unless your attorney recovers compensation for you.

California defective product attorneys work on contingency — typically 33% to 40% of recovery. With California’s pioneering strict liability framework, no statute of repose, and no general damages caps, skilled counsel can drive significant recoveries. Case costs are advanced by the firm under Cal. Rule of Prof. Conduct 1.8.5.

What Can Your California Defective Product Compensation Include?

Economic Damages

Medical bills, future medical care, lost wages, lost earning capacity, and property damage. No cap on economic damages.

Non-Economic Damages

Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment. No statutory cap on non-economic damages in product cases (MICRA cap applies only to med-mal).

Punitive Damages

Available under Civ. Code § 3294 for malice, oppression, or fraud — clear and convincing evidence required. No statutory cap, though federal due process (BMW v. Gore, State Farm v. Campbell) constrains.

Loss of Consortium

Spouse may recover for loss of companionship, services, and intimacy. Children’s loss-of-consortium claims are not generally allowed in California (Borer v. American Airlines).

Wrongful Death

Recoverable by statutory heirs under CCP § 377.60. Includes loss of love, companionship, support, and economic damages.

Medical Monitoring

California recognizes medical monitoring as recoverable consequential damages in toxic-tort cases when present injury or specific exposure thresholds are shown (Potter v. Firestone Tire). VERIFY: not a standalone claim absent injury.

!!!

DearLegal is a legal referral service, not a law firm. We connect individuals with licensed attorneys who can evaluate their case. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice. Results vary based on individual circumstances.

California Defective Product Attorneys

Why Do You Need a Defective Product Attorney in California?

When Do You Need a Defective Product Attorney in California?

Types of Defective Product Cases in California

Common California Defective Product Mistakes

How Much Do California Defective Product Attorneys Cost?

What Can Your California Defective Product Compensation Include?

Ready when you are.

Your help is just

a minute away.

Start your case

in minutes.