Massachusetts

Find an Attorney in Massachusetts

Massachusetts has one of the country’s strongest consumer-protection statutes (Chapter 93A allows up to triple damages for unfair practices), no-fault auto, and a Commission Against Discrimination that hears most state employment claims. Whether you’re in Suffolk, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex, or out west, MA legal practice rewards precision.

Practice areas in Massachusetts

Common questions about Massachusetts attorneys

G.L. c. 93A is the Massachusetts consumer-protection statute. It prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in trade or commerce and allows consumers (under § 9) or businesses (under § 11) to recover actual damages, plus double or treble damages for willful or knowing violations, plus attorney fees. A 30-day demand letter is required before filing under § 9 — failure to make a reasonable settlement offer can lead to enhanced damages. Chapter 93A is one of the strongest UDAP statutes in the country.
Three years from the date of injury under G.L. c. 260, § 2A for most negligence claims. Claims against the Commonwealth or municipalities require a 2-year SOL and presentment under the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act (G.L. c. 258). Medical malpractice has its own 3-year SOL with a 7-year statute of repose under G.L. c. 260, § 4.
Under G.L. c. 90, § 34M and § 34A, you can sue another driver for pain and suffering only if your reasonable and necessary medical expenses exceed $2,000 — or if your injury falls into a permanent-injury category (death, broken bone, substantial disfigurement, loss of body member or function, loss of fetus). PIP covers medical bills and lost wages regardless of fault up to $8,000.
G.L. c. 149, § 24L imposed several new rules for non-competes signed on or after October 1, 2018: 10 business days’ notice before signing, "garden leave" pay of at least 50% of base salary during the restricted period (or other mutually agreed consideration), a 12-month maximum duration, no enforcement against non-exempt workers or workers terminated without cause. The Act has substantially reduced non-compete enforcement in MA.
G.L. c. 231, § 60B requires every med-mal complaint to go through a Medical Tribunal — a 3-person panel (judge, doctor, attorney) that reviews the offer of proof to decide if there’s sufficient evidence of malpractice. If the tribunal rules against the plaintiff, they must post a $6,000 bond ($2,000 for non-physician defendants) to proceed — or the case is dismissed. The tribunal is unique to MA and screens out non-meritorious cases at the pleading stage.

Ready to find your attorney?

Tell us what happened — we’ll match you with a Massachusetts attorney who can evaluate your case.

Find my attorney

DearLegal is a legal referral service, not a law firm. We connect individuals with licensed attorneys who can evaluate their case. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice. Results vary based on individual circumstances.